Bibliographical Database

• Filters:
• • Complete List (Show All)
  • Archival Diplomatics Bibliography
  • Legal Bibliography
  • Digital Forensics Bibliography

Legal Bibliography

• Adler, Gary A., Geoff M. Howard, and Marie A. Lona. Electronic Discovery and Retention Guidance for Corporate Counsel 2007. 2007.
• Adler, M. Peter. "Electronically Stored Information and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." EDUCAUSE Review 3. May/June 2007. (2007): 82-83.
  http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Review/EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume42/ElectronicallyStoredInformatio/158139
• Ahmad, Nehaluddin. "Electronic Evidence and the Rule Against Hearsay: A Comparative Overview." Computer and Telecommunications Law Review 17 (2011): 18-24.
• Allman, Thomas Y. "The Case for a Preservation Safe Harbor in Requests for E-Discovery." Defense Counsel Journal 70 (October 2003): 417-423.
• Allman, Thomas Y. "The Sedona Principles (Second Edition): Accommodating the 2006 E-Discovery Amendments." Federal Courts Law Review (April 2008): 9.
  http://www.fclr.org/fclr/articles/html/2008/fedctslrev2.shtml
• Archibald, Todd L. and James C. Morton. Discovery: Principles in Practice. Toronto ON: CCH Canadian Limited, 2004.
• Arkfeld, Michael R. Electronic Discovery and Evidence. Phoenix AZ: Law Partner Publishing, LLC, 2006.
• Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). Good Practice Guide for Computer-based Electronic Evidence.
  http://www.acpo.police.uk/asp/policies/Data/ACPO%20Guidelines%20v18.pdf
• Association of Chief Police Officers.. Good Practice Guide for Computer-Based Electronic Evidence. 7Safe Information Security, n.d..
  http://www.7safe.com/electronic_evidence/ACPO_guidelines_computer_evidence.pdf
• Atwater, Justin. "Who Owns E-mail? Do You Have the Right to Decide the Disposition of Your Private Digital Life?." Utah Law Review 2 (Srping 2006): 397-418.
• Barker, Clayton L. and Philip W. Goodin. "Discovery of Electronically Stored Information." Journal of the Missouri Bar 64. January/February 2008. (2008): 12-20.
• Bauccio, Salvatore Joseph. "E-Discovery: Why and How E-mail is Changing the Way Trials are Won and Lost." Duquesne Law Review 45. 2. (2007): 269-291.
• Becker, Josh and Trent Hamilton. "The First Nine Months under the New Rules." In Electronic Discovery and Retention Guidance for Corporate Counsel, 199-213. New York: Practising Law Institute, 2007.
• Benetton, Luigi. "E-Discoverying a Solution." The National (March 2008): 18-22; 24.
• Bester, Matthew J. "A Wreck on the Info-Bahn: Electronic Mail and the Destruction of Evidence." CommLaw Conspectus 6. Winter 1998. (1998): 78-88.
• Blair, David C. and M.E. Maron. "An Evaluation of Retrieval Effectiveness for a Full-Text Document- Retrieval System." Communications of the ACM 28. March 1985. (1985): 289-299.
• British Columbia, Supreme Court. British Columbia Electronic Evidence Project. July 1, 2006.
  http://www.courts-gov.bc.ca/sc/ElectronicEvidenceProject/ElectronicEvidenceProject.asp
• Burke, Todd J. E-Discovery in Canada. Markham, ON: LexisNexis, 2008.
• Buskirk, Eric Van and Vincent T. Liu. "Digital Evidence: Challenging the Presumption of Reliability." Journal of Digital Forensic Practice 1 (2006): 19-26.
• Carroll, John L. "Developments in the Law of Electronic Discovery." American Journal of Trial Advocacy 27 (2003): 357-391.
• Carroll, John L. "Preservation of Documents in the Electronic Age – What Should Courts Do?." Federal Courts Law Review 5 (May 2005): 19.
  http://www.fclr.org/fclr/articles/html/2005/fedctslrev5.shtml
• Caudill, David S. "Arsenic and Old Chemistry: Images of Mad Alchemists, Experts Attacking Experts, the Crisis in Forensic Science." Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law 15 (2009): 1-33.
• Chan, Marilee S. "Paper Piles to Computer Files: A Federal Approach to Electronic Records Retention and Management." Santa Clara Law Review 44 (2004).
• Chasse, Ken. "Electronic records as documentary evidence." Canadian Journal of Law and Technology 1 (2007).
• Chilress, Robert, and Jason Park. "Where Is Your Data Located?." Information Management Journal 43. 5. (Sept/Oct 2009): 54-58.
• Cockerham, Scott W. "Lake v. City of Phoenix: Is Metadata a Public Record." Arizona Law Review 51. 2. (Summer 2009): 517-530.
• Collins, Lawrence. "The Hague Evidence Convention and Discovery: A Serious Misunderstanding?." The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 35. 4. (October 1986): 765-786.
• Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section Criminal Division, United States Department of Justice. Searching and Seizing Computers and Obtaining Electronic Evidence in Criminal Investigations.
  http://www.cybercrime.gov/s&smanual2002.htm
• Cudmore, Gordon D. Choate on Discovery. Scarborough, ON: Carswell, Thomas Canada Limited, 1993.
• Curreri, Shannon M. "Defining Document in the Digital Landscape of Electronic Discovery." Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 38 (Summer 2005): 1541-1589.
• Daniel, Larry E. "Plain View Doctrine in Digital Evidence Cases — A Common Sense Approach." Digital Forensics Investigator News (2009/10/19).
  http://www.dfinews.com/print.php?pid=705
• Davidovitch, Gal. "Why Rule 37(e) Does Not Create a New Safe Harbor for Electronic Evidence Spoliation." Seton Hall Law Review 38 (2008): 1131-1165.
• Davis, Anthony E. "Attorney-Client Privilege in Work E-Mails." Legal Technology (November 5, 2009).
  http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1202435191463&AttorneyClient_Privilege_in_Work_EMails
• Delisle, R.J. Canadian evidence law in a nutshell. Scarborough, ON: Thomson Carswell, 2002.
• Department of Justice (US). 2007. Digital Forensic Analysis Methodology.
  http://www.justice.gov/criminal/cybercrime/forensics_chart.pdf
• Department of Justice, Canada. Canada Evidence Act.
  http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/notice/index.html?redirect=%2Fen%2FC-5%2F
• Deutchman, Leonard and Brian T. Wolfinger. Digital Forensics in Civil Litigation. Mechanicsburg, PA: Pennsylvania Bar Institute, 2005.
• Doherty, Michael P. The portable guide to evidence. Scarborough, ON: Carswell, 2001.
• Dreyer, Anthony J. "When the Postman Beeps Twice: The Admissibility of Electronic Mail under the Business Records Exception of the Federal Rules of Evidence." Fordaham Law Review 64 (April 1996): 2285-2328.
• Driver, Khristi Doss. "You’ve got to Know when to ‘Litigation Hold’ ‘em: The Dangers of Failing to Preserve and Produce Electronically Stored Information." The Alabama Lawyer . 68. (November 2007): 445-450.
• Duerr, Thomas E., Nicholas D. Beser, and Gregory P. Staisiunas. "Information Assurance Applied to Authentication of Digital Evidence." Forensic Science Communications 6 (October 2004).
  http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/oct2004/research/2004_10_research01.htm
• Esposito, Grant J., and Thomas M. Mueller. "Backup Tapes, You Can't Live with Them and You Can't Toss Them: Strategies for Dealing with the Litigation Burdens Associated with Backup Tapes under the Amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." Richmond Journal of Law & Technology 13 (2006): 1-26.
• Favro, Philip J. "A New Frontier in Electronic Discovery: Preserving and Obtaining Metadata." Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law 13 (Winter, 2007): 1-24.
• Flynn, Nancy and Khan, Randolph. E-mail rules : a business guide to managing policies, security, and legal issues for email and digital communication. New York: Amacom, 2003.
• Freedman, Bradley J. "Discovery of Electronic Records Under Canadian Law: A Practical Guide." Intellectual Property Journal 18. 1. (2004): 59-81.
• Gable, Julie. "Examining Metadata: Its role in E-Discovery and the Future of Records Managers." Information Management Journal 43. 5. (Sept/Oct 2009).
• Gahtan, Alan M. Electronic evidence. Scarborough, ON: Carswell, 1999.
• Galves, Fred and Christine. "Ensuring the Admissibility of Electronic Forensic Evidence and Enhancing Its Probative Value at Trial." Criminal Justice Magazine 19. Spring. (2004).
  http://www.abanet.org/crimjust/cjmag/19-1/electronic.html
• Giacobbe, Corinne L. "Allocating Discovery Costs in the Computer Age: Deciding Who Should Bear the Costs of Discovery of Electronically Stored Data." Washington and Lee Law Review 57 (Winter 2000).
• Giannelli, Paul C. "Chain of Custody and the Handling of Real Evidence." American Criminal Law Review 20 (Spring 1983): 527-568.
• Gibson, Stanley M. "Litigation Holds: Turning on—And Off—the Switch to Avoid Sanctions and Costly E-Discovery Blunders." In Electronic Discovery and Retention Guidance for Corporate Counsel, 151-162. New York: Practising Law Institute, 2007.
• Gilbert, Lord Geoffrey. The law of evidence. New York: Garland Publishing, 1979.
• Gill, Navdeep. "Getting personal." New Law Journal (September 2007).
• Goldstein, Alan K. "A Short History of Discovery." Anglo-American Law Review 10 (1981): 257-270.
• Gootbenberg, Paul. Imagining Development: Economic Ideas in Peru’s ‘Fictitious Prosperity’ of Guano. Berkeley CA: University of California Press, 1993.
• Grayton, Brian D. "Canadian Legal Issues Arising from Electronic Data Interchange." University of British Columbia Law Review 27. 2. (1993): 257-290.
• Grimm, Paul W., Michael Berman, Leslie Wharton, and Jeanna Beck. "Discovery about Discovery: Does the Attorney-Client Privilege Protect all Attorney-Client Communications Relating to the Preservation of Potentially Relevant Information." University of Baltimore Law Review 37 (Spring 2008): 413-455.
• Grimm, Paul W., Michael V. Ziccardi, and Alexander W. Major. "Back to the Future: Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance Co. and New Findings on the Admissibility of Electronically Stored Information." Akron Law Review 42 (2009): 357-418.
• Gupta, Paul R. "The New Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: The New E-Discovery Rules and Anticipated Impact to Document Retention Policies." In Electronic Discovery and Retention Guidance for Corporate Counsel, 163-170. New York: Practising Law Institute, 2007.
• Hazard, Geoffrey C. "From Whom No Secrets Are Hid." Texas Law Review 76. 7. (1998): 1665-1694.
• Heaps, John and Kathryn Taylor. "The Abuser Pays: The Control of Unwarranted Discovery." New York Law School Law Review 41. 2. (1997): 615-636.
• Hill, Brian W. "Guiding Your Organization Through Murky Waters Defining Your Retention Management Program." Information Management Journal 43. 3. (May/Jun 2009): 50-55.
• Hill, S. Casey, et al. McWilliams' Canadian criminal evidence. Aurora, ON: Canada Law Book, 2003.
• Hrycko, Oleh. Electronic discovery in Canada : best practices and guidelines. Toronto, ON: CCH Canadian, 2007.
• Hume, Gavin, QC, Robert Brun, QC, Bruce LeRose, QC, Glen Ridgway, QC, Kenneth Walker. Report of the Mirror Imaging Working Group: Forensic Copying of Computer Records by the Law Society. Vancouver, BC: Law Society of British Columbia, 14 October 2009.
  http://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/publications_forms/report-committees/intro.html
• Hunter, Jerry M. "The NLRA at 70: Employer E-mail and Communication Policies and the National Labor Relations Act." Labor Law Journal 56. 3. (2005): 196-203.
• Imwinkelried, Edward J. Evidentiary foundations. Indianapolis: Michie Co., 1980.
• International Organization of Computer Evidence (IOCE). (December 2000). Checklist for handling digital Image and Audio evidence.
  http://www.ioce.org/index.php?id=12
• International Organization of Computer Evidence (IOCE). (December 2000). First responders guidelines for digital images and audio.
  http://www.ioce.org/index.php?id=12
• International Organization of Computer Evidence (IOCE). (December 2000). Good Practices for Seizing Electronic Devices.
  http://www.ioce.org/index.php?id=12
• Jablon, Andrew. "'God mail': Authentication and Admissibility of Electronic Mail in Federal Courts." American Criminal Law Review 34. 4. (1997): 1387-1408.
• Jennetten, Peter R. "E-Discovery, Recent Cases: Venue, Format, and Scope." IDC Quarterly 17. 2. (Spring 2007): 47-49.
• Jon Shende. "The Impact of the Cloud on Digital Forensics - Part 1: Taking digital forensics beyond the traditional security perimeter into a cloud security perimeter.." Sys-Con Media (Nov. 29, 2010).
  http://www.sys-con.com/node/1624576
• Jon Shende. "The Impact of the Cloud on Digital Forensics - Part 2: Looking at potential tools that can contribute to the cloud security perimeter." Sys-Con Media (Dec. 2, 2010).
  http://jonshende.ulitzer.com/node/1624595
• Juhnke, Deborah J. "Electronic Discovery in 2010." Information Management Journal 37. 6. (2003): 34-42.
• Kahn, Randolph A. and Diane Silverberg J. "Eight Steps for Keeping Information Management and E-Discovery on Target." Information Management Journal 42. 3. (2008): 48-54.
• Kerr, Orin S. "Fourth Amendment Seizures of Computer Data." Harvard Law Journal 1195 (January 2010): 531-585.
• Kunin, Larry H. "Pitfalls of Runaway E-Discovery Requests." Legal Technology (January 30, 2009).
  http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1202427847832
• Lannon, Paul G., Jr. "The Duty to Preserve Electronic Evidence: When it is Triggered and How to Satisfy It." Boston Bar Journal 51 (March/April 2007): 13-14.
• Launchbaugh, Cynthia. "E-Records Management: A Sad State of Affairs or Golden Opportunity?." Information Management Journal 38. 3. (2004): 20-24.
• Lee, Andrew R. "Keep or Toss? Document Retention Policies in the Digital Era." Louisiana Bar Journal 55 (December 2007/January 2008).
• Leibowitz, Wendy. "Did that E-mail Waive Privilege?." Law Practice Management 29. 2. (March 2003): 6-9.
• Lubert, Steven. "Document Destruction after Arthur Andersen: Is it Still Housekeeping or is it a Crime?." Journal of Appellate Practice and Process 4 (Fall, 2002): 323-329.
• Maguire, William R. and Derek J.T. Adler. "Current Developments in Federal Civil Discovery Practice: Setting Reasonable Limits in the Digital Era." Computer and Internet Lawyer 23. 11. (November 2006): 17-33.
• Marcus, Richard L. "Confronting the Future: Coping with Discovery of Electronic Material." Law and Contemporary Problems 64 (2001): 253-281.
• Mason, Andrew M. "Throwing Out the (Electronic) Trash: True Deletion would Soothe E-Discovery Woes." Minnesota Journal of Law 7 (2006): 777-795.
• Mason, Stephen. In Electronic Evidence: Disclosure, Discovery and Admissibility, Butterworths Law, 2010.
• Mason, Stephen. "Authentic Digital Records: Laying the Foundation for Evidence." Information Management Journal 41. 5. (Sept/Oct 2007): 32-38.
• Mathew, W.M. The House of Gibbs and the Peruvian Guano Monopoly. London: Royal Historical Society, 1981.
• Matthew G. Kirschenbaum, , Richard Ovenden, and Gabriela Redwine. Digital Forensics and Born-Digital Content in Cultural Heritage Collections. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2010.
• Matthews, Paul, Hodge M. Malek, and Katie Bradford. Discovery. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1992.
• Mayer - Brown. Metadata Associated with Email and Documents on Employee’s Personal Computer Are Deemed Records to be Retained and Produced: legal update. USA: Mayer - Brown, Nov. 11, 2010.
• Mazza, Mia, Emmalena K. Quesada, and Ashley L. Sternberg. "In Pursuit of FRCP 1: Creative Approaches to Cutting and Shifting the Costs of Discovery of Electronically Stored Information." Richmond Journal of Law & Technology 13 (2007): 1-87.
• Mazzone, Martha A. "The New E-Discovery Frontier: Seeking Facts in the Web 2.0 World (and other Miscellany)." Boston Bar Journal 53 (January/February 2009): 8-11.
• McLean, Thomas R. "EMR Metadata Uses and E-Discovery." Annals of Health Law 18 (Winter 2009): 75-118.
• McNeil, Heidi and Robert M. Kort. "Discovery of E-mail: Electronic Mail and Other Computer Information Shouldn’t be Overlooked." The Oregon State Bar Bulletin 56 (December 1995): 21-24.
• Medvend, Robert A. "E-Discovery and the Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Primer." Washington State Bar News (June 2006).
  http://www.wsba.org/media/publications/barnews/june06-medved.htm
• Messina, Joseph P. and Daniel B. Trinkle. "Document Retention Policies after Anderson." Boston Bar Journal 46 (2002): 18-21.
• Ministry of Attorney General. Consultation on Reforming the Limitation Act. September 15, 2010.
  http://www.ag.gov.bc.ca/legislation
• Ministry of the Attorney General (BC). Consultation on Reforming the Limitation Act.
  http://www.ag.gov.bc.ca/legislation/pdf/LimitationActWhitePaperFINAL.pdf
• Montaña, John. "Strategies for Minimizing Litigation Risks, Costs." Information Management Journal 42. Hot Topic Supplement. (March/April 2008): 10-12.
• Montaña, John C. "GARP: Mapping a Route for Compliance." Information Management Journal 43. 5. (Sept/Oct 2009): 10-12.
• Montaña, John C. Legal Obstacles to E-Mail Message Destruction. Pittsburgh PA: The ARMA International Educational Foundation, 2003. 1-42.
  http://www.armaedfoundation.org/pdfs/Legal_obstacles_to_e-mail_destruction_v6a_English.pdf
• Morgan, Charles and Saulgrain, Julien. E-mail Law. Markham, ON: LexisNexis, 2008.
• Moss, Scott A. "Litigation Discovery Cannot be Optimal but Could be Better: The Economics of Improving Discovery Timing in a Digital Age." Duke Law Journal 58 (March 2009): 889-954.
• Muhl, Charles J. "E-mail and Internet Use: Employees and Employers Beware." Monthly Labor Review 126 (February 2003): 36-45.
• Murray, Daniel R., Timothy J. Chorvat, and Chad E. Bell. "Taking a Byte out of Discovery: How the Properties of Electronically Stored Information Have Shaped E-Discovery Rules." Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal 41 (2008).
  http://www.jenner.com/files/tbl_s20Publications%5CRelatedDocumentsPDFs1252%5C2285%5CCommercial%20Code%20Law%20Journal_Murray%20Chorvat%20Bell_2008.pdf
• Nash, Kim S.. "E-Mail Retention: The High Cost of Digging Up Data." Baseline Magazine (August 2, 2006).
  http://www.baselinemag.com/c/a/Projects-Processes/EMail-Retention-The-High-Cost-of-Digging-Up-Data/
• Nelson, Sharon D., and John Simek. "Technology Tips for Cutting E-Discovery Costs." Information Management Journal 43. 2. (March/April 2009).
• Paciocco, David M.. "'Truth and Proof': The basics of the law of evidence in a "guilt-based" system." Canadian Criminal Law Review 6 (2000).
• Paciocco, David M. and Lee Stuesser. The Law of Evidence. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law, 2008.
  http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=186933&loc=
• Paul, George L. Foundations of Digital Evidence. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association, 2008.
• Peritz, Rudolph J. "Computer Data and Reliability: A Call for Authentication of Business Records Under the Federal Rules of Evidence." Northwestern University Law Review 80 (1986): 956-1002.
• Raskin, Jeffrey S. "Discovery of Ghosts in the Machine: Electronic Mail Communications Can Have Major Litigation Consequences." Los Angeles Lawyer 19 (November 1996): 17-42.
• Redish, Martin H. "Electronic Discovery and the Litigation Matrix." Duke Law Journal 51 (November 2001): 561-628.
• Ricci S.C. Ieong. "FORZA – Digital Forensics Investigation Framework that Incorporate Legal Issues." Digital Investigations 3S (2006): S29-S36.
• Rice, Paul R. Electronic Evidence Law and Practice. Chicago: American Bar Association Publishing, 2005.
• Richert, Paul. "Electronic Discovery Bibliography." Akron Law Review 42 (2009): 419-430.
• Ries, David E. "Records Management: Current Issues in Retention, Destruction, and E-Discovery." Pennsylvania Bar Association Quarterly 78 (2007): 139-159.
• Robins, Mark D. "Evidence at the Electronic Frontier: Introduce E-mail at Trail in Commercial Litigation." Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal 29. 2. (Summer 2003): 219-315.
• Rogers, Douglas L. "A Search for Balance in the Discovery of ESI Since December 1, 2006." Richmond Journal of Law & Technology 14. 3. (Spring 2008): 1-32.
  http://law.richmond.edu/jolt/v14i3/article8.pdf
• Romano, Leah Voigt. "Electronic Evidence and the Federal Rules." Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 38 (Summer 2005): 1745-1801.
• Rosenthal, Lee H. and James C. Francis IV. "The Philip D. Reed Lecture Series: Panel Discussion: Managing Electronic Discovery: Views from the Judges." Fordham Law Review 76. 1. (October 2007).
• Scheindlin, Shira A. and Jeffrey Rabkin. "Electronic Discovery in Federal Civil Litigation: Is Rule 34 up to the Task?." Boston College Law Review 41 (March 2000): 327-382.
• Scheindlin, Shira A. and Jonathan M. Redgrave. "Special Masters and E-Discovery: The Intersection of Two Recent Revisions to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." Cardozo Law Review 30 (November 2008): 347-405.
• Schiermeyer, Kara A. "The Artful Dodger: Responding Parties' Ability to Avoid Electronic Discovery Costs under 26(b)(2)(B) and 26 (b)(2)(C) and the Preservation Obligation." Creighton Law Review 42. 2. (2009).
• Sedona Conference Working Group 1. "The Sedona Conference Commentary on Best Practices Commentary on the Use of Search and Information Retrieval Methods in E-Discovery." The Sedona Conference Journal 8 (Fall 2007): 189-223.
• Sedona Conference Working Group 1. "The Sedona Conference Commentary on Email Management: Guidelines for the Selection of Retention Policy." The Sedona Conference Journal 8 (Fall 2007): 239-250.
• Sedona Conference Working Group 1. "The Sedona Conference Commentary on Preservation, Management and Identification of Sources of Information that are Not Reasonably Accessible." The Sedona Conference 10 (Fall 2009).
  http://www.sedonaconference.com/dltForm?did=NRA.pdf
• Sedona Conference Working Group 1. "The Sedona Conference Glossary: E-Discovery & Digital Information Management." The Sedona Conference 2nd Edition (December 2007).
  http://www.sedonaconference.com/dltForm?did=TSCGlossary_12_07.pdf
• Sedona Conference Working Group 1. "The Sedona Guidelines: Best Practice Guidelines & Commentary for Managing Information & Records in the Electronic Age." The Sedona Conference 2nd Edition (November 2007).
  http://www.sedonaconference.com/dltForm?did=Guidelines.pdf
• Sedona Conference Working Group 7, Sedona Canada. "The Sedona Canada Principles: Addressing Electronic Discovery." The Sedona Conference (January 2008).
  http://www.sedonaconference.com/dltForm?did=canada_pincpls_FINAL_108.pdf
• Sedona Conference Working Group Series, The. (June 2007). The Sedona Principles: Second Edition Best Practices Recommendations & Principles for Addressing Electronic Document Production.
  http://www.thesedonaconference.org/content/miscFiles/TSC_PRINCP_2nd_ed_607.pdf
• Sedona Conference, Sedona Canada, The. "The Sedona Canada Principles Addressing Electronic Discovery." Sedona Conference Working Group 7 (WG7), Sedona Canada, January 2008.
  http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/e-discovery/
• Shilling, Cameron G. "Electronic Discovery: Litigation Crashes into the Digital Age." The Labor Lawyer 22 (Fall 2006): 207-232.
• Sidoti, Mark S. and Paul E. Asfendis. "E-Discovery Issues With Digital Voicemail." New York Law Journal (October 9, 2009).
  http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1202434402099&EDiscovery_Issues_With_Digital_Voicemail#
• Silbert, Benjamin D. "The 2006 Amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure: Accessible and Inaccessible Electronic Information Storage Devices, Why Parties Should Store Electronic Information in Accessible Formats." Richmond Journal of Law & Technology 13 (Spring 2007): 24.
  http://law.richmond.edu/jolt/v13i3/article14.pdf
• Sommer, Peter. "Meetings between experts: A route to simpler, fairer trials?." Digital Investigation 5 (2009): 146-152.
• Srivastava, Aashish. "Legal Understanding and Issues with Electronic Signatures: An Empirical Study of Large Businesses." Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal 35. 1. (2008): 42-76.
• Starkie, Thomas. Practical Treastie of the Law of Evidence. Philadelphia: T. & J.W. Johnson, 1876.
  http://galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/MOML?dd=0&locID=ubcolumbia&d1=19008178600&srchtp=a&c=1&an=19008178600&d2=1&docNum=F3706569183&h2=1&af=RN&d6=1&ste=10&dc=tiPG&stp=Author&d4=0.33&d5=d6&ae=F106569183
• Stein, Alex. Foundations of Evidence Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
• Stretton, Tracey. "International electronic disclosure." Digital Investigation 3 (2006): 115-117.
• Swartz, Nikki. "New Rules for E-Discovery: New Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure May Make Electronic Discovery Easier and Less Costly for Corporations." Information Management Journal 40 (November/December 2006): 22-26.
• Swartz, Nikki. "Playing with Electronic Fire." Information Management Journal 41 (January/February 2007).
• Swartz, Nikki. "Putting Retention Management on the Right Track." Information Management Journal 41 (November/December 2007): 24-28.
• Swartz, Nikki. "Work E-mail Is Public Record." Information Management Journal 38. 3. (2004): 14.
• Tew, Thomas C. "Electronic Discovery Misconduct in Litigation: Letting the Punishment Fit the Crime." University of Miami Law Review 61 (January 2007): 289-330.
• Thayer, James Bradley. A Preliminary treatise on evidence at the common law. Boston MA: Little, Brown, and Company, 1989.
• the Honourable Patrick J. LeSage and Professor Michael Code. Report of the Review of Large and Complex Criminal Case Procedures. Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General: Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2008.
  http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/pubs/lesage_code/lesage_code_report_en.pdf
• the Honourable Stephen T. Goudge, Commissioner. Inquiry into Pediatric Forensic Pathology in Ontario. Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General: Queen's Printer Ontario, 2008.
  http://www.goudgeinquiry.ca/
• Trend Micro. Addressing Compliance Requirements for Privacy, Data Retention, and e-Discovery. Cupertino CA: Trend Micro Incorporated, March 2009. 1-8.
  http://us.trendmicro.com/imperia/md/content/us/pdf/products/enterprise/leakproof/wp_compliancesolns_final.pdf?zid=dlp_compliance_reqs
• Turner, Philip. "Unification of digital evidence from disparate sources (Digital Evidence Bags)." Digital Investigation 2 (2005): 223-228.
• Tushinski, Paul and Rishi Bhasin. "Dutton Brock LLP". Dutton Brock (2008/01/25). http://www.duttonbrock.com/dutton/news/mm/1_135.pdf, accessed (2009/10/15).
• Tyler, Mark L., David R. Neill, and S. Stuart Clark. "Electronic Discovery Issues: Disclosure Requirements in Britain, Canada, and Australia." Defense Counsel Journal 65. 2. (1998): 208-227.
• Underwood, Graham J. and Harvey M. Groberman. Electronic Evidence: Materials Prepared for the Continuing Legal Education Seminar, Electronic Evidence 2007. Vancouver, BC: Continuing Legal Education of B.C., 2007.
• Unger, Karen. "10 Critical Decisions for Successful E-discovery." Information Management Journal 41. 5. (Sept/Oct 2007): 70-73.
• Uniform Law Conference of Canada. (1998). Uniform Electronic Evidence Act.
  http://www.ulcc.ca/en/us/index.cfm?sec=1&sub=1u2
• Uniform Law Conference of Canada. Uniform Electronic Evidence Act: Consultation Paper. March 1997.
  http://www.ulcc.ca/en/poam2/index.cfm?sec=1997&sub=1997hka
• United States Department of Justice, Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section Criminal Division. (July 2002). Searching and Seizing Computers and Obtaining Electronic Evidence in Criminal Investigations.
  http://www.cybercrime.gov/s&smanual2002.htm
• United States of America. Federal Rules of Evidence.
  http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/overview.html
• United States Secret Service. Best Practices for Seizing Forensic Evidence.
  http://web.archive.org/web/20040216205126/www.ustreas.gov/usss/electronic_evidence.shtml
• van Oostenrijk, Lloyd S. "Paper or Plastic?: Electronic Discovery and Spoliation in the Digital Age." Houston Law Review 42 (2005): 1163-1203.
• Wang, Zachary. "Ethics and Electronic Discovery: New Medium, Same Problems." Defense Counsel Journal 75 (October 2008).
• Watt, David. Watt's Manual of Criminal Evidence. Scarborough, ON: Carswell, 1998-2009.
• Westcott II, W. Lawrence. "Shedding Light on Backup Tape E-Discovery." Information Management Journal 43. 5. (Sept/Oct 2009).
• White, Robert B. The art of discovery. Aurora, ON: Canada Law Book, 1990.
• Wigmore, Kim A. and Justine Lundberg. E-Discovery in British Columbia. Vancouver, BC: Whitelaw Twining Law Corporation, August 2007. 7.
  http://www.whitelawtwining.com/pdfs/686269_1.pdF
• Wilkins, Jesse. "Technologies for Managing E-mail." Information Management Journal 42. Hot Topic Supplement. (March/April 2008): 2-8.
• Wilson, John S. "MySpace, Your Space, or Our Space? New Frontiers in Electronic Evidence." Oregon Law Review 86 (2007): 1201-1240.
• Withers, Kenneth J. "'Ephemeral Data’ and the Duty to Preserve Discoverable Electronically Stored Information." University of Baltimore Law Review 37. 3. (Spring 2008).
• Withers, Kenneth J. Annotated Case Law on Electronic Discovery. June 1, 2006.
  http://www.discoveryresources.org/case-law-and-rules/
• Woolf, Harry. Access to justice : interim report to the Lord Chancellor on the civil justice system in England and Wales. London: Lord Chancellor’s Dept., 1995.
• Wotherspoon, David and Elliott Myers. Electronic Evidence and eDiscovery: Materials Prepared for the Continuing Legal Education Seminar, Electronic Evidence and eDiscovery 2006: The Brave New World, held in Vancouver, B.C. on April 27, 2006. Vancouver, BC: Continuing Legal Education of B.C., 2006.