Bibliographical Database

• Filters:
• • Complete List (Show All)
  • Archival Diplomatics Bibliography
  • Legal Bibliography
  • Digital Forensics Bibliography

Digital Records Forensics Bibliography

• "2008: Year of E-Mail Management." Information Management Journal 42. 2. (May/April 2008): 19.
  http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=31309771&site=ehost-live
• The Long-term Preservation of Authentic Electronic Records: Findings of the InterPARES Project. Edited by Duranti, Luciana. San Miniato: Archilab, 2005.
• Adelstein, Frank. "Live Forensics: Diagnosing your system without killing it first." Communications of the ACM 49. 2. (February 2006): 63-66.
• Adler, Gary A., Geoff M. Howard, and Marie A. Lona. Electronic Discovery and Retention Guidance for Corporate Counsel 2007. 2007.
• Adler, M. Peter. "Electronically Stored Information and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." EDUCAUSE Review 3. May/June 2007. (2007): 82-83.
  http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Review/EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume42/ElectronicallyStoredInformatio/158139
• Ahmad, Nehaluddin. "Electronic Evidence and the Rule Against Hearsay: A Comparative Overview." Computer and Telecommunications Law Review 17 (2011): 18-24.
• Alink, W., R.A.F. Bhoedjang, P.A. Boncz, and A.P. de Vries. "XIRAF – XML-based indexing and querying for digital forensics." Digital Investigation 3 (September 2006): S50-S58.
• Allman, Thomas Y. "Defining Culpability: The Search for a Limited Safe Harbor in Electronic Discovery." Federal Courts Law Review . 7. (September 2006): 1-17.
• Allman, Thomas Y. "The Case for a Preservation Safe Harbor in Requests for E-Discovery." Defense Counsel Journal 70 (October 2003): 417-423.
• Allman, Thomas Y. "The Sedona Principles (Second Edition): Accommodating the 2006 E-Discovery Amendments." Federal Courts Law Review (April 2008): 9.
  http://www.fclr.org/fclr/articles/html/2008/fedctslrev2.shtml
• Anand, Anita Indira. "Securities Law in the Internet Age: Is Regulating by Analogy the Right Approach." Queen's Law Journal 27 (2001-2002): 129-160.
• Archibald, Todd L. and James C. Morton. Discovery: Principles in Practice. Toronto ON: CCH Canadian Limited, 2004.
• Arkfeld, Michael R. Electronic Discovery and Evidence. Phoenix AZ: Law Partner Publishing, LLC, 2006.
• Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). Good Practice Guide for Computer-based Electronic Evidence.
  http://www.acpo.police.uk/asp/policies/Data/ACPO%20Guidelines%20v18.pdf
• Association of Chief Police Officers.. Good Practice Guide for Computer-Based Electronic Evidence. 7Safe Information Security, n.d..
  http://www.7safe.com/electronic_evidence/ACPO_guidelines_computer_evidence.pdf
• Atwater, Justin. "Who Owns E-mail? Do You Have the Right to Decide the Disposition of Your Private Digital Life?." Utah Law Review 2 (Srping 2006): 397-418.
• Ayers, Daniel. "A second generation computer forensic analysis system." Digital Investigation 6 (2009): S34-S42.
• Barbara, John J. "Digital evidence accreditation in the corporate and business environment." Digital Investigation 2. 2. (2005): 137-146.
• Barbiche, Bernard. "Diplomatics of Modern Official Documents (Sixteenth - Eighteenth Centuries): Evaluation and Perspectives." American Archivist 59. 4. (1996).
• Barker, Clayton L. and Philip W. Goodin. "Discovery of Electronically Stored Information." Journal of the Missouri Bar 64. January/February 2008. (2008): 12-20.
• Bauccio, Salvatore Joseph. "E-Discovery: Why and How E-mail is Changing the Way Trials are Won and Lost." Duquesne Law Review 45. 2. (2007): 269-291.
• Bearman, David. "Moments of Risk: Identifying Threats to Electronic Records." Archivaria 62 (2006): 15-46.
• Becker, Josh and Trent Hamilton. "The First Nine Months under the New Rules." In Electronic Discovery and Retention Guidance for Corporate Counsel, 199-213. New York: Practising Law Institute, 2007.
• Beebe, Nicole Lang, Sonia D. Stacy, and Dane Stuckey. "Digital forensic implications of ZFS." Digital Investigation 6. Supplement. (2009): S99-S107.
• Benetton, Luigi. "E-Discoverying a Solution." The National (March 2008): 18-22; 24.
• Bester, Matthew J. "A Wreck on the Info-Bahn: Electronic Mail and the Destruction of Evidence." CommLaw Conspectus 6. Winter 1998. (1998): 78-88.
• Blair, David C. and M.E. Maron. "An Evaluation of Retrieval Effectiveness for a Full-Text Document- Retrieval System." Communications of the ACM 28. March 1985. (1985): 289-299.
• Blouin, Francis. "A Framework for a Consideration of Diplomatics in the Electronic Environment." American Archivist 59. 4. (1996): 466-479.
• Boyd, Chris and Pete Forster. "Time and date issues in forensic computing - a case study." Digital Investigation 1 (2004): 18-23.
• Bradbury, Danny. "At work with the digital detectives – When number crunchers and bean counters meet." Digital Investigation 3 (2006): 13-15.
• Brait, Richard A.. "Commercial Law in the Age of the Internet Forum." University of New Brunswick Law Journal 48 (1999): 243-252.
• Brinson, Ashley, Abigail Robinson, and Marcus Rogers. "A cyber forensics ontology: Creating a new approach to studying cyber forensics." Digital Investigation 3. Supplement 1. (2006): S37-S43.
• British Columbia, Supreme Court. British Columbia Electronic Evidence Project. July 1, 2006.
  http://www.courts-gov.bc.ca/sc/ElectronicEvidenceProject/ElectronicEvidenceProject.asp
• Buchholz, Florian and Brett Tjaden. "A brief study of time." Digital Investigation 4S (2007): S31-S42.
• Buchholz, Florian and Eugene Spafford. "On the role of file system metadata in digital forensics." Digital Investigation 1 (2004).
• Burke, Todd J. E-Discovery in Canada. Markham, ON: LexisNexis, 2008.
• Buskirk, Eric Van and Vincent T. Liu. "Digital Evidence: Challenging the Presumption of Reliability." Journal of Digital Forensic Practice 1 (2006): 19-26.
• Cannell, Hugh A.. "Convergence of Technology and the Law." University of New Brunswick Law Journal (1999): 301-312.
• Carrier, Brian. Open Source Digital Forensics Tools: The Legal Argument.
  www.digital-evidence.org/papers/opensrc_legal.pdf
• Carrier, Brian D.. "Risks of Live digital Forensic Analysis." Communications of the ACM 49 (February 2006): 56-61.
• Carrier, Brian D., Eugene H. Spafford. "Categories of digital investigation analysis techniques based on the computer history model." Digital Investigation 3. Supplemental. (2006): S121-S130.
• Carroll, John L. "Developments in the Law of Electronic Discovery." American Journal of Trial Advocacy 27 (2003): 357-391.
• Carroll, John L. "Preservation of Documents in the Electronic Age – What Should Courts Do?." Federal Courts Law Review 5 (May 2005): 19.
  http://www.fclr.org/fclr/articles/html/2005/fedctslrev5.shtml
• Case, Andrew, Cristina Andrew, Lodovico Marziale, Golden G. Richard, and Vassil Roussev. "FACE: Automated digital evidence discovery and correlation." Digital Investigation 5 (2008): S65-S75.
• Casey, Eoghan. "Attacks against forensic analysis." Digital Investigations 4 (2007): 104-106.
• Casey, Eoghan. "Digital forensics: Coming of age." Digital Investigation 6 (2009): 1-2.
• Casey, Eoghan. "What does "forensically sound" really mean?." Digital Investigations 4 (2007): 49-50.
• Caudill, David S. "Arsenic and Old Chemistry: Images of Mad Alchemists, Experts Attacking Experts, the Crisis in Forensic Science." Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law 15 (2009): 1-33.
• Chan, Marilee S. "Paper Piles to Computer Files: A Federal Approach to Electronic Records Retention and Management." Santa Clara Law Review 44 (2004).
• Chasse, Ken. "Electronic Discovery in the Criminal Court System." Canadian Criminal Law Review 14 (February, 2010): 111-180.
• Chasse, Ken. "Electronic records as documentary evidence." Canadian Journal of Law and Technology 1 (2007).
• Chauhan, Jagruti. "Online Dispute Resolution Systems: Exploring E-Commerce and E- Securities." Windsor Review of Legal and Social Issues 15. March. (2002): 99-111.
  http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/wrlsi15&id=103
• Chilress, Robert, and Jason Park. "Where Is Your Data Located?." Information Management Journal 43. 5. (Sept/Oct 2009): 54-58.
• Cockerham, Scott W. "Lake v. City of Phoenix: Is Metadata a Public Record." Arizona Law Review 51. 2. (Summer 2009): 517-530.
• Cockfield, Arthur J.. "Towards a Law and Technology Theory." Manitoba Law Journal 30. 3. (2004): 383-415.
• Cohen, Michael, Simson Garfinkel, and Bradley Schatz. "Extending the advanced forensic format to accommodate multiple data sources, logical evidence, arbitrary information and forensic workflow." Digital Investigation 6 (2009): S57-S68.
• Collins, Lawrence. "The Hague Evidence Convention and Discovery: A Serious Misunderstanding?." The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 35. 4. (October 1986): 765-786.
• Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community, National Research Council. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2009.
• Common Digital Evidence Storage Format Working Group, The. "Standardizing: DIGITAL EVIDENCE STORAGE." Communications of the ACM 49. 2. (February 2006): 67-68.
• Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section Criminal Division, United States Department of Justice. Searching and Seizing Computers and Obtaining Electronic Evidence in Criminal Investigations.
  http://www.cybercrime.gov/s&smanual2002.htm
• Cudmore, Gordon D. Choate on Discovery. Scarborough, ON: Carswell, Thomas Canada Limited, 1993.
• Curreri, Shannon M. "Defining Document in the Digital Landscape of Electronic Discovery." Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 38 (Summer 2005): 1541-1589.
• Daniel, Larry E. "Plain View Doctrine in Digital Evidence Cases — A Common Sense Approach." Digital Forensics Investigator News (2009/10/19).
  http://www.dfinews.com/print.php?pid=705
• Daniel, Scanlan M.. "Digital Forensics." In Digital Evidence in Criminal Law, Aurora, ON: Canadian Law Book, 2011.
• Davidovitch, Gal. "Why Rule 37(e) Does Not Create a New Safe Harbor for Electronic Evidence Spoliation." Seton Hall Law Review 38 (2008): 1131-1165.
• Davis, Anthony E. "Attorney-Client Privilege in Work E-Mails." Legal Technology (November 5, 2009).
  http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1202435191463&AttorneyClient_Privilege_in_Work_EMails
• Delisle, R.J. Canadian evidence law in a nutshell. Scarborough, ON: Thomson Carswell, 2002.
• Department of Justice (US). 2007. Digital Forensic Analysis Methodology.
  http://www.justice.gov/criminal/cybercrime/forensics_chart.pdf
• Department of Justice, Canada. Canada Evidence Act.
  http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/notice/index.html?redirect=%2Fen%2FC-5%2F
• Deutchman, Leonard and Brian T. Wolfinger. Digital Forensics in Civil Litigation. Mechanicsburg, PA: Pennsylvania Bar Institute, 2005.
• Digital Discovery Corporation. "Digital Discovery". Digital Forensics: The preservation, extraction, identification, analysis and documentation of digital evidence (2010). http://www.digitaldiscoverycorp.com/forensics/methodology.htm, accessed (2011/01/01).
• Doherty, Michael P. The portable guide to evidence. Scarborough, ON: Carswell, 2001.
• Dreyer, Anthony J. "When the Postman Beeps Twice: The Admissibility of Electronic Mail under the Business Records Exception of the Federal Rules of Evidence." Fordaham Law Review 64 (April 1996): 2285-2328.
• Driver, Khristi Doss. "You’ve got to Know when to ‘Litigation Hold’ ‘em: The Dangers of Failing to Preserve and Produce Electronically Stored Information." The Alabama Lawyer . 68. (November 2007): 445-450.
• Duerr, Thomas E., Nicholas D. Beser, and Gregory P. Staisiunas. "Information Assurance Applied to Authentication of Digital Evidence." Forensic Science Communications 6 (October 2004).
  http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/oct2004/research/2004_10_research01.htm
• Duranti, Luciana. Diplomatics. New Uses for an Old Science. Chicago: Scarecrow Press, 1998.
• Esposito, Grant J., and Thomas M. Mueller. "Backup Tapes, You Can't Live with Them and You Can't Toss Them: Strategies for Dealing with the Litigation Burdens Associated with Backup Tapes under the Amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." Richmond Journal of Law & Technology 13 (2006): 1-26.
• Favro, Philip J. "A New Frontier in Electronic Discovery: Preserving and Obtaining Metadata." Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law 13 (Winter, 2007): 1-24.
• Fiedler, Betsy S. "Are Your Eyes Deceiving You? The Evidentiary Crisis Regarding the Admissibility of Computer Generated Evidence." New York Law School Law Review 48 (2003/04).
• Flynn, Nancy and Khan, Randolph. E-mail rules : a business guide to managing policies, security, and legal issues for email and digital communication. New York: Amacom, 2003.
• Freedman, Bradley J. "Discovery of Electronic Records Under Canadian Law: A Practical Guide." Intellectual Property Journal 18. 1. (2004): 59-81.
• Freedman, Bradley J.. "Electronic Contracts Under Canadian Law-A Practical Guide." Manitoba Law Journal 28. 1. (2000): 1-60.
• Freedman, Bradley J. and Robert J. C. Deane. "Trade-Marks and the Internet: A Canadian Perspective." University of British Columbia Law Review 34. 2. (2001): 345-414.
• Gable, Julie. "Examining Metadata: Its role in E-Discovery and the Future of Records Managers." Information Management Journal 43. 5. (Sept/Oct 2009).
• Gahtan, Alan M. Electronic evidence. Scarborough, ON: Carswell, 1999.
• Gallanis, T.P. "The Rise of Modern Evidence Law." Iowa Law Review 84. 3. (1999): 499-560.
• Galves, Fred and Christine. "Ensuring the Admissibility of Electronic Forensic Evidence and Enhancing Its Probative Value at Trial." Criminal Justice Magazine 19. Spring. (2004).
  http://www.abanet.org/crimjust/cjmag/19-1/electronic.html
• Garfinkel, S., Malan, D., Dubec, K., Stevens, C, Pham, C. "Disk Imaging with the Advanced Forensics Format, Library and Tools." The Second Annual IFIP WG 11.9 International Conference on Digital Forensics, National Center for Forensic Science, Orlando, Florida, USA, January 29 - February 1 2006.
  http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/forensics/aff.php
• Garfinkel, Simson L. "AFF: A New Format for Storing Hard Drive Images." Communications of the ACM 49 (February 2006): 85-87.
  http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/forensics/aff.php
• Gautrais, Vincent. "The Colour of E-Consent." University of Ottawa Law & Technology Journal 1 (2003-2004): 189.
  http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/uoltj1&id=195
• Geist, Michael. "When Dot-Coms Die: The E-Commerce Challenge to Canada's Bankruptcy Law." Canadian Business Law Journal 37 (2002): 34-74.
  http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/canadbus37&id=54
• Gero, John and Tom Oommen. "Electronic Commerce and Trade Policy: The Government's Role the Impact of Technological Change in the Canada/U.S. Context." Canada-United States Law Journal 25 (1999): 323-331.
  http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/canusa25&id=347
• Geva, Benjamin. "Consumer Liability in Unauthorized Electronic Funds Transfers." Canadian Business Law Journal 38. April. (2003): 207-281.
  http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/canadbus38&id=223
• Geva, Benjamin. "The E.F.T. Debit Card." Canadian Business Law Journal 15 (September, 1989): 406-440.
  http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/canadbus15&id=422
• Giacobbe, Corinne L. "Allocating Discovery Costs in the Computer Age: Deciding Who Should Bear the Costs of Discovery of Electronically Stored Data." Washington and Lee Law Review 57 (Winter 2000).
• Giannelli, Paul C. "Chain of Custody and the Handling of Real Evidence." American Criminal Law Review 20 (Spring 1983): 527-568.
• Gibson, Stanley M. "Litigation Holds: Turning on—And Off—the Switch to Avoid Sanctions and Costly E-Discovery Blunders." In Electronic Discovery and Retention Guidance for Corporate Counsel, 151-162. New York: Practising Law Institute, 2007.
• Gilbert, Lord Geoffrey. The law of evidence. New York: Garland Publishing, 1979.
• Gill, Navdeep. "Getting personal." New Law Journal (September 2007).
• Golden, Richard G. and Vassil Roussev. "Next-Generation Digital Forensics." Communications of the ACM 49. 2. (February 2006): 76-80.
• Goldstein, Alan K. "A Short History of Discovery." Anglo-American Law Review 10 (1981): 257-270.
• Gootbenberg, Paul. Imagining Development: Economic Ideas in Peru’s ‘Fictitious Prosperity’ of Guano. Berkeley CA: University of California Press, 1993.
• Grayton, Brian D. "Canadian Legal Issues Arising from Electronic Data Interchange." University of British Columbia Law Review 27. 2. (1993): 257-290.
• Gregory, John D.. "Canadian Electronic Commerce Legislation." Lex Electronica 6. Printemps, 2000. .
  http://www.lex-electronica.org/articles/v6-1/gregory.htm
• Gregory, John D.. "Solving Legal Issues in Electronic Commerce." Canadian Business Law Journal 32 (July, 1999): 84-131.
• Gregory, John D.. "The law goes electronic." In Annual Reivew of Civil Litigation 2009, ed. T. Archibald and R. Echlin. 127-192. Toronto: Carswell, 2009.
• Grimm, Paul W., Michael Berman, Leslie Wharton, and Jeanna Beck. "Discovery about Discovery: Does the Attorney-Client Privilege Protect all Attorney-Client Communications Relating to the Preservation of Potentially Relevant Information." University of Baltimore Law Review 37 (Spring 2008): 413-455.
• Grimm, Paul W., Michael V. Ziccardi, and Alexander W. Major. "Back to the Future: Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance Co. and New Findings on the Admissibility of Electronically Stored Information." Akron Law Review 42 (2009): 357-418.
• Groberman, Harvey M. and Underwood, Graham J. Electronic evidence : materials prepared for the Continuing Legal Education seminar, Electronic evidence 2007. Vancouver, BC: Continuing Legal Education of B.C., 2007.
• Gupta, Paul R. "The New Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: The New E-Discovery Rules and Anticipated Impact to Document Retention Policies." In Electronic Discovery and Retention Guidance for Corporate Counsel, 163-170. New York: Practising Law Institute, 2007.
• Hadjidj, Rachid, Mourad Debbabi, Hakim Lounis, Farkhund Iqbal, Adam Szorer, Djamel Benredjem. "Towards an integrated e-mail forensic analysis framework." Digital Investigation 5 (2009): 124-137.
• Hayhoe, Robert. "Fraud, the Consumer, and the Banks: The (Un-) Regulation of Electronic Funds Transfer Comment." University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review 53. Spring. (1995): 346-358.
  http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/utflr53&id=352
• Hazard, Geoffrey C. "From Whom No Secrets Are Hid." Texas Law Review 76. 7. (1998): 1665-1694.
• Heaps, John and Kathryn Taylor. "The Abuser Pays: The Control of Unwarranted Discovery." New York Law School Law Review 41. 2. (1997): 615-636.
• Hill, Brian W. "Guiding Your Organization Through Murky Waters Defining Your Retention Management Program." Information Management Journal 43. 3. (May/Jun 2009): 50-55.
• Hill, S. Casey, et al. McWilliams' Canadian criminal evidence. Aurora, ON: Canada Law Book, 2003.
• Hosmer, Chet. "Digital Evidence Bag." Communications of the ACM 49. 2. (February 2006): 69-70.
• Howell, Beryl A. "Digital Forensics: Sleuthing on Hard Drives and Networks." Vermont Law Journal 31 (Fall 2005): 39-45.
• Howes, David. "E-Legislation: Law-Making in the Digital Age." McGill Law Journal 47. November. (2001): 39-58.
  http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/mcgil47&id=49
• Hrycko, Oleh. Electronic discovery in Canada : best practices and guidelines. Toronto, ON: CCH Canadian, 2007.
• Hume, Gavin, QC, Robert Brun, QC, Bruce LeRose, QC, Glen Ridgway, QC, Kenneth Walker. Report of the Mirror Imaging Working Group: Forensic Copying of Computer Records by the Law Society. Vancouver, BC: Law Society of British Columbia, 14 October 2009.
  http://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/publications_forms/report-committees/intro.html
• Hunter, Jerry M. "The NLRA at 70: Employer E-mail and Communication Policies and the National Labor Relations Act." Labor Law Journal 56. 3. (2005): 196-203.
• Imwinkelried, Edward J. Evidentiary foundations. Indianapolis: Michie Co., 1980.
• International Organization of Computer Evidence (IOCE). (December 2000). Checklist for handling digital Image and Audio evidence.
  http://www.ioce.org/index.php?id=12
• International Organization of Computer Evidence (IOCE). (December 2000). First responders guidelines for digital images and audio.
  http://www.ioce.org/index.php?id=12
• International Organization of Computer Evidence (IOCE). (December 2000). Good Practices for Seizing Electronic Devices.
  http://www.ioce.org/index.php?id=12
• International Organization of Computer Evidence (IOCE). (2002). Guidelines for Best Practice in the Forensic Examination of Digital Technology.
  http://www.ioce.org/fileadmin/user_upload/2002/ioce_bp_exam_digit_tech.html
• INTERPOL. Forensic Report on FARC Computers and Hardware Seized by Colombia. Lyon, France: ICPO-INTERPOL, 2008.
• Irons, A.D., P. Stephens, R.I. Ferguson. "Digital Investigation as a distinct discipline: A pedagogic perspective." Digital Investigation 6 (2009): 82-90.
• Irons, Alastair. "Computer forensics and records management – compatible disciplines." Records Management Journal 16. 2. (2006): 102-112.
  http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewPDF.jsp?contentType=Article&Filename=html/Output/Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Pdf/2810160205.pdf
• Jablon, Andrew. "'God mail': Authentication and Admissibility of Electronic Mail in Federal Courts." American Criminal Law Review 34. 4. (1997): 1387-1408.
• Jennetten, Peter R. "E-Discovery, Recent Cases: Venue, Format, and Scope." IDC Quarterly 17. 2. (Spring 2007): 47-49.
• Jon Shende. "The Impact of the Cloud on Digital Forensics - Part 1: Taking digital forensics beyond the traditional security perimeter into a cloud security perimeter.." Sys-Con Media (Nov. 29, 2010).
  http://www.sys-con.com/node/1624576
• Jon Shende. "The Impact of the Cloud on Digital Forensics - Part 2: Looking at potential tools that can contribute to the cloud security perimeter." Sys-Con Media (Dec. 2, 2010).
  http://jonshende.ulitzer.com/node/1624595
• Jones, Keith J., R. Bejtlic, & C.W. Rose. Real digital forensics : computer security and incident response. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley, 2005.
• Juhnke, Deborah J. "Electronic Discovery in 2010." Information Management Journal 37. 6. (2003): 34-42.
• Kahn, Randolph A. and Diane Silverberg J. "Eight Steps for Keeping Information Management and E-Discovery on Target." Information Management Journal 42. 3. (2008): 48-54.
• Kahvedzic,Damir, Tahar Kechadi, Digital Forensic Research workshop. "DIALOG: A framework for modeling, analysis and reuse of digital forensic knowledge." Digital Investigation 6 (2009): S23-S33.
• Kenneally, Erin. "Gatekeeping Out Of The Box: Open Source Software As A Mechanism To Assess Reliability For Digital Evidence." Virginia Journal of Law and Technology 13 (Fall 2001).
  www.vjolt.net/vol6/issue3/v6i3-a13-Kenneally.html
• Kent, James and Chris Dale. "7Safe". ediscovery and forensics (February 2010). http://7safe.com/resources.html, accessed (2010/03/03).
• Kerr, Ian R.. "Spirits in the Material World: Intelligent Agents as Intermediaries in Electronic Commerce." Dalhousie Law Journal 22. 2. (Fall, 1999).
  http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/dalholwj22&id=456
• Kerr, Orin S. "Fourth Amendment Seizures of Computer Data." Harvard Law Journal 1195 (January 2010): 531-585.
• Kidd, Donnie L. and William H. Daughtrey, Jr.. "Adapting Contract Law to Accommodate Electronic Contracts: Overview and Suggestions." Rutgers, Computer & Technology Law Journal 26. 2. (2000): 215-276.
  http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/rutcomt26&id=221
• Kim, Kibom, Sangseo Park, Taejoo Chang, Cheolwon Lee, and Sungjai Baek. "Lessons learned from the construction of a Korean software reference data set for digital forensics." Digital Investigation 6. Supplement. (2009): S108-S113.
• Kunin, Larry H. "Pitfalls of Runaway E-Discovery Requests." Legal Technology (January 30, 2009).
  http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1202427847832
• Lannon, Paul G., Jr. "The Duty to Preserve Electronic Evidence: When it is Triggered and How to Satisfy It." Boston Bar Journal 51 (March/April 2007): 13-14.
• Launchbaugh, Cynthia. "E-Records Management: A Sad State of Affairs or Golden Opportunity?." Information Management Journal 38. 3. (2004): 20-24.
• Lee, Andrew R. "Keep or Toss? Document Retention Policies in the Digital Era." Louisiana Bar Journal 55 (December 2007/January 2008).
• Leibowitz, Wendy. "Did that E-mail Waive Privilege?." Law Practice Management 29. 2. (March 2003): 6-9.
• Leigland, Ryan and Axel W. Krings. "A Formalization of Digital Forensics." International Journal of Digital Evidence 3 (Fall 2004).
• Levine, Brian Neil, and Marc Liberatore. "DEX: Digital evidence provenance supporting reproducibility and comparison." Digital Investigation 6. Supplement. (2009): S48-S56.
• Lewis, Mark. "Digital Signatures: Meeting the Traditional Requirements Electronically, A Canadian Perspective." Asper Review of International Business and Trade Law 2 (2002): 63-84.
• Li, Jinyan. "Consumption Taxation of Electronic Commerce: Problems, Policy Implications and Proposals for Reform." Canadian Business Law Journal 38 (2003): 425-465.
• Lubert, Steven. "Document Destruction after Arthur Andersen: Is it Still Housekeeping or is it a Crime?." Journal of Appellate Practice and Process 4 (Fall, 2002): 323-329.
• Luciana Duranti. "From Digital Diplomatics to Digital Records Forensics." Archivaria 68 (2009).
• Luciana Duranti and Barbara Endicott-Popovsky. "Digital Records Forensics: A New Science and Academic Program for Forensic Readiness." Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law 5 (2010): 45-62.
• MacDonnell, John. "Exporting Trust: Does E-Commerce Need A Canadian Privacy Seal of Approval?." Alberta Law Review 39. 2. (2001): 346-440.
  http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/alblr39&id=356
• MacNeil, Heather. Trusting records: legal, historical, and diplomatic perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2000.
• Madam Justice Victoria Gray; Michael D. Lucas, Manager, Policy and Legal Services, Law Society of British Columbia; K. Michael Stephens, Hunter Litigation Chambers; and Robert Dawkins, Borden Ladner Gervais. "Draft Model Order for Seizure and Safekeeping of Evidence". http://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/publications_forms/notices/docs/10-07-06_antonpiller.pdf, accessed (2010/09/20).
• Maguire, William R. and Derek J.T. Adler. "Current Developments in Federal Civil Discovery Practice: Setting Reasonable Limits in the Digital Era." Computer and Internet Lawyer 23. 11. (November 2006): 17-33.
• Marc Liberatore, Robert Erdely, Thomas Kerle, Brian Neil Levine, Clay Shields. "Forensic Investigation of Peer-to-peer File Sharing Networks." Digital Investigations 7 (2010).
  http://www.dfrws.org/2010/proceedings/2010-311.pdf
• Marcus K. Rogers, James Goldman, Rick Mislan, Timothy Wedge. "Computer Forensics Field Triage Process Model." Conference on Digital Forensics, Security and Law (2006): 27-40.
  http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.169.1878
• Marcus, Richard L. "Confronting the Future: Coping with Discovery of Electronic Material." Law and Contemporary Problems 64 (2001): 253-281.
• Mason, Andrew M. "Throwing Out the (Electronic) Trash: True Deletion would Soothe E-Discovery Woes." Minnesota Journal of Law 7 (2006): 777-795.
• Mason, Stephen. In Electronic Evidence: Disclosure, Discovery and Admissibility, Butterworths Law, 2010.
• Mason, Stephen. "Authentic Digital Records: Laying the Foundation for Evidence." Information Management Journal 41. 5. (Sept/Oct 2007): 32-38.
• Mason, Stephen. "Rethinking Concepts in Virtual Evidence." The Icfai Journal of Cyber Law VII (2008).
• Mathew, W.M. The House of Gibbs and the Peruvian Guano Monopoly. London: Royal Historical Society, 1981.
• Matthew G. Kirschenbaum, , Richard Ovenden, and Gabriela Redwine. Digital Forensics and Born-Digital Content in Cultural Heritage Collections. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2010.
• Matthew Meyers, Marc Rogers. "Computer Forensics: The Need for Standardization and Certification." International Journal of Digital Evidence 3. Fall. (2004): 1-11.
  http://www2.tech.purdue.edu/cpt/courses/TECH581A/meyersrogers_ijde.pdf
• Matthews, Paul, Hodge M. Malek, and Katie Bradford. Discovery. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1992.
• Mayer - Brown. Metadata Associated with Email and Documents on Employee’s Personal Computer Are Deemed Records to be Retained and Produced: legal update. USA: Mayer - Brown, Nov. 11, 2010.
• Mazza, Mia, Emmalena K. Quesada, and Ashley L. Sternberg. "In Pursuit of FRCP 1: Creative Approaches to Cutting and Shifting the Costs of Discovery of Electronically Stored Information." Richmond Journal of Law & Technology 13 (2007): 1-87.
• Mazzone, Martha A. "The New E-Discovery Frontier: Seeking Facts in the Web 2.0 World (and other Miscellany)." Boston Bar Journal 53 (January/February 2009): 8-11.
• Mc Isaac QC, Barbara and Fohr, Howard R.. "Legal update, Canada: PIPEDA's Secure Electronic Signature Regulations have been published." Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 2 (2005): 71-72.
• McCombie, S. and M. Warren. "Computer Forensic: An Issue of Definitions." 1st Australian Computer, Network & Information Forensics Conference 2003, Perth, Western Australia, November 2003.
  http://scissec.scis.ecu.edu.au/wordpress/conference_proceedings/2003/forensics/
• McLean, Thomas R. "EMR Metadata Uses and E-Discovery." Annals of Health Law 18 (Winter 2009): 75-118.
• McNeil, Heidi and Robert M. Kort. "Discovery of E-mail: Electronic Mail and Other Computer Information Shouldn’t be Overlooked." The Oregon State Bar Bulletin 56 (December 1995): 21-24.
• McTaggart, Craig. "A Layered Approach to Internet Legal Analysis." McGill Law Journal 48 (2003): 571-625.
  http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/mcgil48&id=579
• Medvend, Robert A. "E-Discovery and the Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Primer." Washington State Bar News (June 2006).
  http://www.wsba.org/media/publications/barnews/june06-medved.htm
• Messina, Joseph P. and Daniel B. Trinkle. "Document Retention Policies after Anderson." Boston Bar Journal 46 (2002): 18-21.
• Ministry of Attorney General. Consultation on Reforming the Limitation Act. September 15, 2010.
  http://www.ag.gov.bc.ca/legislation
• Ministry of the Attorney General (BC). Consultation on Reforming the Limitation Act.
  http://www.ag.gov.bc.ca/legislation/pdf/LimitationActWhitePaperFINAL.pdf
• Mocas, Sarah. "Building Theoretical Underpinnings for Digital Forensics Research." Digital Investigation 1. 1. (2004): 61-68.
  www.elsevier.com/locate/diin
• Montaña, John. "Strategies for Minimizing Litigation Risks, Costs." Information Management Journal 42. Hot Topic Supplement. (March/April 2008): 10-12.
• Montaña, John C. "GARP: Mapping a Route for Compliance." Information Management Journal 43. 5. (Sept/Oct 2009): 10-12.
• Montaña, John C. Legal Obstacles to E-Mail Message Destruction. Pittsburgh PA: The ARMA International Educational Foundation, 2003. 1-42.
  http://www.armaedfoundation.org/pdfs/Legal_obstacles_to_e-mail_destruction_v6a_English.pdf
• Morgan, Charles and Saulgrain, Julien. E-mail Law. Markham, ON: LexisNexis, 2008.
• Moss, Scott A. "Litigation Discovery Cannot be Optimal but Could be Better: The Economics of Improving Discovery Timing in a Digital Age." Duke Law Journal 58 (March 2009): 889-954.
• Muhl, Charles J. "E-mail and Internet Use: Employees and Employers Beware." Monthly Labor Review 126 (February 2003): 36-45.
• Murray, Daniel R., Timothy J. Chorvat, and Chad E. Bell. "Taking a Byte out of Discovery: How the Properties of Electronically Stored Information Have Shaped E-Discovery Rules." Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal 41 (2008).
  http://www.jenner.com/files/tbl_s20Publications%5CRelatedDocumentsPDFs1252%5C2285%5CCommercial%20Code%20Law%20Journal_Murray%20Chorvat%20Bell_2008.pdf
• Nance, Kara, Helen Armstrong, and Colin Armstrong. "Digital Forensics: Defining an Education Agenda." 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - 2010, Hawaii, 2010.
  http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/HICSS.2010.151
• Nash, Kim S.. "E-Mail Retention: The High Cost of Digging Up Data." Baseline Magazine (August 2, 2006).
  http://www.baselinemag.com/c/a/Projects-Processes/EMail-Retention-The-High-Cost-of-Digging-Up-Data/
• National Institute of Justice. "Computer Forensics Tool Testing Program". http://www.nij.gov/topics/forensics/evidence/digital/standards/cftt.htm, accessed (2012/02/23).
• Nelson, Sharon D., and John Simek. "Technology Tips for Cutting E-Discovery Costs." Information Management Journal 43. 2. (March/April 2009).
• Neumueller, Carina. "Are we there Yet? an Analysis of Canadian and European Adjudicatory Jurisdiction Principles in the Context of Electronic Commerce Consumer Protection and Policy Issues." University of Ottawa Law & Technology Journal 3 (2006): 421-456.
  http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/uoltj3&id=421
• Noblett, Michael G., Mark M. Pollitt, and Lawrence A. Presley. "Recovering and Examining Computer Forensic Evidence." Forensic Science Communications 2. October. (2000).
  http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/lab/forensic-science-communications/
• Nutter, Beverley. "Pinpointing TomTom location records: A forensic analysis." Digital Investigation 5 (2008): 10-18.
• Paciocco, David M.. "'Truth and Proof': The basics of the law of evidence in a "guilt-based" system." Canadian Criminal Law Review 6 (2000).
• Paciocco, David M. and Lee Stuesser. The Law of Evidence. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law, 2008.
  http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=186933&loc=
• Palmer, Gary. A Road Map for Digital Forensic Research Report From the First Digital Forensic Research Workshop (DFRWS). Utica, NY: Sponsored By AFRL/IFGB Air Force Research Laboratory, Rome Research Site Information Directorate/Defensive Information Warfare Branch, November 6, 2001.
• Palmer, Gary L. "Forensic Analysis in the Digital World." International Journal of Digital Evidence 1. 1. .
  www.ijdc.org/docs/IJDE_1.3.doc
• Park, Jungheum, and Lee, Sangjin. "Forensic investigation of Microsoft PowerPoint files." Digital Investigation 6 (2009): 16-24.
• Parliament of Canada. (2009 (2nd reading)). Electronic Commerce Protection Act (Bill C-27).
  http://www2.parl.gc.ca/Sites/LOP/LegislativeSummaries/Bills_ls.asp?lang=E&ls=c27&source=library_prb&Parl=40&Ses=2
• Paul, George L. Foundations of Digital Evidence. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association, 2008.
• Pengelley, P.. "Fessing up to Facebook: Recent trends in the use of social network websites for civil litigation." Canadian Journal of Law and Technology 7 (2009 (forthcoming)).
• Peritz, Rudolph J. "Computer Data and Reliability: A Call for Authentication of Business Records Under the Federal Rules of Evidence." Northwestern University Law Review 80 (1986): 956-1002.
• Pollitt, Mark. "A History of Digital Forensics." IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 337 (2010): 3-15.
  http://www.springerlink.com/content/gr3v34n5248r7x28/
• Pollitt, Mark. "Applying Traditional Forensic Taxonomy to Digital Forensics." IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 285 (2008): 17-26.
  http://www.springerlink.com/content/0170312257u0h051/
• Power, E. Michael. "Electronic Government (1999)." University of New Brunswick Law Journal (1999): 209-216.
• Power, Michael. "Bill C-G: Federal Legislation in the Age of the Internet Comment." Manitoba Law Journal 26. 2. (1999): 235-256.
  http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/manitob26&id=245
• Ramirez, Juan. "Finding ‘Safe Harbor’ in a Sea of Electronic Discovery." Wisconsin Technology Network (December 19, 2007).
  http://wistechnology.com/articles/4001/
• Raskin, Jeffrey S. "Discovery of Ghosts in the Machine: Electronic Mail Communications Can Have Major Litigation Consequences." Los Angeles Lawyer 19 (November 1996): 17-42.
• Redish, Martin H. "Electronic Discovery and the Litigation Matrix." Duke Law Journal 51 (November 2001): 561-628.
• Reith, Mark, Clint Carr, and Gregg Gunsch. "An Examination of Digital Forensic Models." International Journal of Digital Evidence 1. 3. (Fall 2002).
• Ricci S.C. Ieong. "FORZA – Digital Forensics Investigation Framework that Incorporate Legal Issues." Digital Investigations 3S (2006): S29-S36.
• Rice, Paul R. Electronic Evidence Law and Practice. Chicago: American Bar Association Publishing, 2005.
• Richert, Paul. "Electronic Discovery Bibliography." Akron Law Review 42 (2009): 419-430.
• Ries, David E. "Records Management: Current Issues in Retention, Destruction, and E-Discovery." Pennsylvania Bar Association Quarterly 78 (2007): 139-159.
• Robins, Mark D. "Evidence at the Electronic Frontier: Introduce E-mail at Trail in Commercial Litigation." Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal 29. 2. (Summer 2003): 219-315.
• Rogers, Douglas L. "A Search for Balance in the Discovery of ESI Since December 1, 2006." Richmond Journal of Law & Technology 14. 3. (Spring 2008): 1-32.
  http://law.richmond.edu/jolt/v14i3/article8.pdf
• Romano, Leah Voigt. "Electronic Evidence and the Federal Rules." Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 38 (Summer 2005): 1745-1801.
• Rosenthal, Lee H. and James C. Francis IV. "The Philip D. Reed Lecture Series: Panel Discussion: Managing Electronic Discovery: Views from the Judges." Fordham Law Review 76. 1. (October 2007).
• Rotman, Leonard I.. "The Fiduciary Regulation of E-Commerce." Queen's Law Journal 29. 2. (Spring, 2004): 739-788.
  http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/queen29&id=749
• Scheindlin, Shira A. and Jeffrey Rabkin. "Electronic Discovery in Federal Civil Litigation: Is Rule 34 up to the Task?." Boston College Law Review 41 (March 2000): 327-382.
• Scheindlin, Shira A. and Jonathan M. Redgrave. "Special Masters and E-Discovery: The Intersection of Two Recent Revisions to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." Cardozo Law Review 30 (November 2008): 347-405.
• Schiermeyer, Kara A. "The Artful Dodger: Responding Parties' Ability to Avoid Electronic Discovery Costs under 26(b)(2)(B) and 26 (b)(2)(C) and the Preservation Obligation." Creighton Law Review 42. 2. (2009).
• Scientific Working Group on Imaging Technology (SWGIT). "Best Practices for Archiving Digital and Multimedia Evidence (DME) in the Criminal Justice System." Forensic Science Communications 10 (April 2008).
  http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/april2008/standards/2008_04_standards03.htm
• Scientific Working Group on Imaging Technology (SWGIT). (2008). Best Practices for Image Authentication.
  http://www2.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/april2008/standards/2008_04_standards02.htm
• Scientific Working Group on Imaging Technology (SWGIT).. "Best Practices for Maintaining the Integrity of Digital Images and Digital Video." Forensic Science Communications 10. April. (2008).
  http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/lab/forensic-science-communications/
• Sedona Conference Working Group 1. "The Sedona Conference Commentary on Best Practices Commentary on the Use of Search and Information Retrieval Methods in E-Discovery." The Sedona Conference Journal 8 (Fall 2007): 189-223.
• Sedona Conference Working Group 1. "The Sedona Conference Commentary on Email Management: Guidelines for the Selection of Retention Policy." The Sedona Conference Journal 8 (Fall 2007): 239-250.
• Sedona Conference Working Group 1. "The Sedona Conference Commentary on Preservation, Management and Identification of Sources of Information that are Not Reasonably Accessible." The Sedona Conference 10 (Fall 2009).
  http://www.sedonaconference.com/dltForm?did=NRA.pdf
• Sedona Conference Working Group 1. "The Sedona Conference Glossary: E-Discovery & Digital Information Management." The Sedona Conference 2nd Edition (December 2007).
  http://www.sedonaconference.com/dltForm?did=TSCGlossary_12_07.pdf
• Sedona Conference Working Group 1. "The Sedona Guidelines: Best Practice Guidelines & Commentary for Managing Information & Records in the Electronic Age." The Sedona Conference 2nd Edition (November 2007).
  http://www.sedonaconference.com/dltForm?did=Guidelines.pdf
• Sedona Conference Working Group 7, Sedona Canada. "The Sedona Canada Principles: Addressing Electronic Discovery." The Sedona Conference (January 2008).
  http://www.sedonaconference.com/dltForm?did=canada_pincpls_FINAL_108.pdf
• Sedona Conference Working Group Series, The. (June 2007). The Sedona Principles: Second Edition Best Practices Recommendations & Principles for Addressing Electronic Document Production.
  http://www.thesedonaconference.org/content/miscFiles/TSC_PRINCP_2nd_ed_607.pdf
• Sedona Conference, Sedona Canada, The. "The Sedona Canada Principles Addressing Electronic Discovery." Sedona Conference Working Group 7 (WG7), Sedona Canada, January 2008.
  http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/e-discovery/
• Shilling, Cameron G. "Electronic Discovery: Litigation Crashes into the Digital Age." The Labor Lawyer 22 (Fall 2006): 207-232.
• Sidoti, Mark S. and Paul E. Asfendis. "E-Discovery Issues With Digital Voicemail." New York Law Journal (October 9, 2009).
  http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1202434402099&EDiscovery_Issues_With_Digital_Voicemail#
• Silbert, Benjamin D. "The 2006 Amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure: Accessible and Inaccessible Electronic Information Storage Devices, Why Parties Should Store Electronic Information in Accessible Formats." Richmond Journal of Law & Technology 13 (Spring 2007): 24.
  http://law.richmond.edu/jolt/v13i3/article14.pdf
• Simson L. Garfinkel. "Digital Forensics Research: The Next 10 Years." Digital Investigations 7 (2010): S64-S73.
  http://www.dfrws.org/2010/proceedings/2010-308.pdf
• Siti Rahayu Selamat, Robiah Yusof, Shahrin Sahib. "Mapping Process of Digital Forensic Investigation Framework." International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 8. October. (2008): 163-169.
• Sommer, Peter. "Meetings between experts: A route to simpler, fairer trials?." Digital Investigation 5 (2009): 146-152.
• Sookman, Barry B.. "Electronic Commerce, Internet and the Law: A Survey of the Legal Issues." University of New Brunswick Law Journal 48 (1999): 119-161.
• Sopinka, John, Alan Bryant, and Sidney N. Lederman. The Law of Evidence in Canada. Markham, ON: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2004.
• Srivastava, Aashish. "Legal Understanding and Issues with Electronic Signatures: An Empirical Study of Large Businesses." Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal 35. 1. (2008): 42-76.
• Starkie, Thomas. Practical Treastie of the Law of Evidence. Philadelphia: T. & J.W. Johnson, 1876.
  http://galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/MOML?dd=0&locID=ubcolumbia&d1=19008178600&srchtp=a&c=1&an=19008178600&d2=1&docNum=F3706569183&h2=1&af=RN&d6=1&ste=10&dc=tiPG&stp=Author&d4=0.33&d5=d6&ae=F106569183
• Stein, Alex. Foundations of Evidence Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
• Stretton, Tracey. "International electronic disclosure." Digital Investigation 3 (2006): 115-117.
• Sulzenko, Andrei. "The Impact of Technological Change in the Canada/U.S. Context: Challenges of Rapid Technological Change -- Catching Up with the Jetsons." Canada-United States Law Journal 25 (1999): 21-42.
  http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/canusa25&id=45
• Swartz, Nikki. "New Rules for E-Discovery: New Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure May Make Electronic Discovery Easier and Less Costly for Corporations." Information Management Journal 40 (November/December 2006): 22-26.
• Swartz, Nikki. "Playing with Electronic Fire." Information Management Journal 41 (January/February 2007).
• Swartz, Nikki. "Putting Retention Management on the Right Track." Information Management Journal 41 (November/December 2007): 24-28.
• Swartz, Nikki. "Work E-mail Is Public Record." Information Management Journal 38. 3. (2004): 14.
• Taylor, Carol, Barbara Endicott-Popovsky, and Deborah A. Frincke. "Specifying digital forensics: A forensics policy approach." Digital Investigation 4. Suplemental. (2007): S101-S104.
• Teelink, Sheldon and Robert F. Erbacher. "Improving the Computer Forensic Analysis Process through: VISUALIZATION." Communications ACM 49. 2. (February 2006): 71-76.
• Tew, Thomas C. "Electronic Discovery Misconduct in Litigation: Letting the Punishment Fit the Crime." University of Miami Law Review 61 (January 2007): 289-330.
• Thayer, James Bradley. A Preliminary treatise on evidence at the common law. Boston MA: Little, Brown, and Company, 1989.
• the Honourable Patrick J. LeSage and Professor Michael Code. Report of the Review of Large and Complex Criminal Case Procedures. Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General: Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2008.
  http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/pubs/lesage_code/lesage_code_report_en.pdf
• the Honourable Stephen T. Goudge, Commissioner. Inquiry into Pediatric Forensic Pathology in Ontario. Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General: Queen's Printer Ontario, 2008.
  http://www.goudgeinquiry.ca/
• Trakman, Leon E.. "From the Medieval Law Merchant to E-Merchant Law." University of Toronto Law Journal 53. 3. (Summer, 2003): 265-304.
  http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/utlj53&id=275
• Trend Micro. Addressing Compliance Requirements for Privacy, Data Retention, and e-Discovery. Cupertino CA: Trend Micro Incorporated, March 2009. 1-8.
  http://us.trendmicro.com/imperia/md/content/us/pdf/products/enterprise/leakproof/wp_compliancesolns_final.pdf?zid=dlp_compliance_reqs
• Turner, Philip. "Digital provenance e interpretation, verification and corroboration." Digital Investigation 2 (2005): 45-49.
• Turner, Philip. "Unification of digital evidence from disparate sources (Digital Evidence Bags)." Digital Investigation 2 (2005): 223-228.
• Tushinski, Paul and Rishi Bhasin. "Dutton Brock LLP". Dutton Brock (2008/01/25). http://www.duttonbrock.com/dutton/news/mm/1_135.pdf, accessed (2009/10/15).
• Tyler, Mark L., David R. Neill, and S. Stuart Clark. "Electronic Discovery Issues: Disclosure Requirements in Britain, Canada, and Australia." Defense Counsel Journal 65. 2. (1998): 208-227.
• Underwood, Graham J. and Harvey M. Groberman. Electronic Evidence: Materials Prepared for the Continuing Legal Education Seminar, Electronic Evidence 2007. Vancouver, BC: Continuing Legal Education of B.C., 2007.
• Unger, Karen. "10 Critical Decisions for Successful E-discovery." Information Management Journal 41. 5. (Sept/Oct 2007): 70-73.
• Uniform Law Conference of Canada. (1999). Uniform Electronic Commerce Act.
  http://www.ulcc.ca/en/us/index.cfm?sec=1&sub=1u1
• Uniform Law Conference of Canada. (1998). Uniform Electronic Evidence Act.
  http://www.ulcc.ca/en/us/index.cfm?sec=1&sub=1u2
• Uniform Law Conference of Canada. Uniform Electronic Evidence Act: Consultation Paper. March 1997.
  http://www.ulcc.ca/en/poam2/index.cfm?sec=1997&sub=1997hka
• United States Department of Justice, Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section Criminal Division. (July 2002). Searching and Seizing Computers and Obtaining Electronic Evidence in Criminal Investigations.
  http://www.cybercrime.gov/s&smanual2002.htm
• United States of America. Federal Rules of Evidence.
  http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/overview.html
• United States Secret Service. Best Practices for Seizing Forensic Evidence.
  http://web.archive.org/web/20040216205126/www.ustreas.gov/usss/electronic_evidence.shtml
• van Oostenrijk, Lloyd S. "Paper or Plastic?: Electronic Discovery and Spoliation in the Digital Age." Houston Law Review 42 (2005): 1163-1203.
• Venansius Baryamureeba, Florence Tushabe. "The Enhanced Digital Investigation Process Model." Digital Forensic Research Workshop (2004): 1-9.
• Wang, Zachary. "Ethics and Electronic Discovery: New Medium, Same Problems." Defense Counsel Journal 75 (October 2008).
• Wardwell, James, and G. Stevenson Smith. "Recovering erased digital evidence from CD-RW discs in a child exploitation investigation." Digital Investigation 5 (2008): 6-9.
• Watt, David. Watt's Manual of Criminal Evidence. Scarborough, ON: Carswell, 1998-2009.
• Wayne Jansen and Aurélien Delaitre. Mobile Forensic Reference Materials: A Methodology and Reification. Gaithersburg, MD: Computer Security Division, Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, October 2009. 30.
• Weiland, Richard. "The Uniform Electronic Commerce Act: Removing Barriers to Expanding E-Commerce." Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform (CA) 7 (2001): 6-13.
  http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/appeal7&id=8
• Westcott II, W. Lawrence. "Shedding Light on Backup Tape E-Discovery." Information Management Journal 43. 5. (Sept/Oct 2009).
• White, Robert B. The art of discovery. Aurora, ON: Canada Law Book, 1990.
• Wigmore, Kim A. and Justine Lundberg. E-Discovery in British Columbia. Vancouver, BC: Whitelaw Twining Law Corporation, August 2007. 7.
  http://www.whitelawtwining.com/pdfs/686269_1.pdF
• Wilkins, Jesse. "Technologies for Managing E-mail." Information Management Journal 42. Hot Topic Supplement. (March/April 2008): 2-8.
• Williams, Amy-Lynne. "Electronic Commerce: Cutting Edge Changes and Challenges to Commercial Law and Practice Forum." University of New Brunswick Law Journal (1999): 217-242.
• Williams, Caroline. "Diplomatic Attitudes: From Mabillon to Metadata." Journal of the Society of Archivists 26 (April 2005): 1-24.
• Wilson, John S. "MySpace, Your Space, or Our Space? New Frontiers in Electronic Evidence." Oregon Law Review 86 (2007): 1201-1240.
• Withers, Kenneth J. "'Ephemeral Data’ and the Duty to Preserve Discoverable Electronically Stored Information." University of Baltimore Law Review 37. 3. (Spring 2008).
• Withers, Kenneth J. Annotated Case Law on Electronic Discovery. June 1, 2006.
  http://www.discoveryresources.org/case-law-and-rules/
• Woolf, Harry. Access to justice : interim report to the Lord Chancellor on the civil justice system in England and Wales. London: Lord Chancellor’s Dept., 1995.
• Wotherspoon, David and Elliott Myers. Electronic Evidence and eDiscovery: Materials Prepared for the Continuing Legal Education Seminar, Electronic Evidence and eDiscovery 2006: The Brave New World, held in Vancouver, B.C. on April 27, 2006. Vancouver, BC: Continuing Legal Education of B.C., 2006.
• Yaylaian, Talya. "Warning: Statutes May be Interpreted in an Unforeseeably Expansive Manner: United States v. Councilman." New England Law Review 41 (Winter 2007): 293-338.